FaceUpToFred

Police Sergeant Crowley 1
Harvard Professor Gates 0
President Obama 0

I waited. I didn’t want to be guilty of the amateur mistake that the President made, which was speaking with authority without knowing the facts. Since the story is told to me by “main stream media” sources I am very skeptical that I have the facts, but I am proceeding anyway.

About a week ago a women called the police because the house next door was being broken into. She did not mention the race of the perps. As it turned out the tenant of the house and his acquaintance were breaking in because the tenant had no keys. The tenant was a man who had a job that was to perpetuate racism as a Harvard PHD Professor of “African American studies.” You know what that is.

The professor, living in a pool of racism and swimming in that pool professionally every day, could not resist the opportunity to give his racism a practical application. So few professors ever actually encounter the real world, in their ivory tower, “their world is mostly all theoretic.” It was an opportunity not to be missed. The professor embraced the opportunity by making a racial issue out of something that had no racial element to it. Being that the officer was a “white man” the professor could not resist creating one.

He became so belligerent and unmanageable that the officer had finally had enough and arrested him. What followed was a terribly poor report to the President, because the professor was associated with the President and knew of the President’s racism. Remember the professor was an authority on that subject. The professor wanted to exploit the power of the Presidency for his own egotistical power binge.

The poor manipulated President took the bait and embarrassed himself publicly by supporting the arrogant racist Harvard professor.

Recording devises have gone to give us an unimpeachable unbiased source of information from which to get our own impression of what happened that night.
The professor’s lies were exposed. The cop’s story was confirmed.

Now the professor has embarrassed Harvard. In reality he has disqualified himself from teaching but he is not really a teacher anyway. He is a Marxist indoctrinator and as such, he will be staying at Harvard. The President of the United States has embarrassed himself by exposing his own racism and his lack of professional poise. Funny, isn’t that what the previous President was always ridiculed for? Lack of Presidential poise? People called him an idiot. Remember?

In the final analysis, the Harvard incident score card reads:
(First of all, shouldn’t the word sergeant be spelled “sargent?” “I mean really?”)

Police Sergeant Crowley - Professional 1
Harvard Professor Gates - Jackass 0
President Obama - Poser 0 

Imagine being “ganged up on” by Obama and company. The dignified and unintimidated police officer’s actions were justified and he knew it.
It seems that the “commander in chief” of the military forces of the United States can take a lesson in professional poise from a regular working man, who has shown the “high class” that comes from commitment to professional training and a real work ethic.

Last weekend while driving I heard a story that was truly wonderful. It was the story of Regina Benjamin.

First let me give you a little back story. Barack Obama needs to find a surgeon general for his cabinet. His first choice was to go for the very charismatic Sanjay Gupta. Sanjay Gupta is qualified for this job, but is either not interested in public service, not interested in Barack Obama, or is not interested in making $160,000 per year which he can make with a few TV appearances. He declined. Can you imagine? No, to Barack Obama? Well!

I was never really in love with idea of Sanjay Gupta. Though he does have the medical credentials he is really a media “spokes model.” I guess Obama is a fan of that kind of qualification. You know, appearance over substance. There is nothing wrong with Mr. Gupta, I am just not a fan. I was happy for America that he declined the offer.

Next, in the President’s quest to keep “white men” out of Washington, he discovered Regina Benjamin. Rather than expound the virtues of this wonderful woman I ask you to do a Google search on her name. If you are anything like me you will just fall in love with her. The story I heard on the radio made me stop and say, “way to go big O.” I love being able to support the President, and I get so few chances any more. Not that I believe anything from “main stream media” but the story was just plain wonderful. The story gave me “hope.” “You know, like the President was supposed to, like we hoped he would before we were “shot down” by actually seeing him in office.”

America has what is referred to as “an epidemic with obesity.” The entire world characterizes Americans as a bunch of bloated pigs. You know this is true because of the many comedy routines based on this. Comedians have become America’s only real source for truth since the media, politicians, judges, churches and schools have all turned their back on it. Apparently there is more money in lies.

So I was in love with the idea of Regina Benjamin. Well, this morning I saw her picture. As it turns out she is morbidly obese. This fact does not make me think any less of her or her absolutely fantastic achievements. This woman is a hero and true champion in every sense of the word. I was crushed.

Why must we have a President who can not prove his citizenship? Why did we have to have that parade of tax cheats until, amazingly, we actually accepted one as Secretary of the Treasury? Why do we have a Secretary of State who couldn’t out-perform a slut? Why are we vetting a person with documented biases, prejudices, for the Supreme Court? And now why, for heavens sake, are we going to subject this great person, Regina Benjamin, and all America, to face another ugly idiotic controversy?

You have to ask yourself if Obama is joking. Why, why, why, does he keep doing this? Is his demand that America accepts his disrespect so important to him that he mocks us at every turn?
Obviously Regina Benjamin can not be the surgeon general. Leaders must lead by example. Obesity is not OK. Pick somebody that does not have an immediate glaring problem. Isn’t there one American who would be “just right.” That’s the person we need. That’s what we deserve. The President’s job is to find that person. Why must every one of Obama’s people be “just not right?” Is it because that is what he is?

I realize that Mr. Obama has only been in the White House for seven months or about one eighth of his term, but he did make very many strong statements about “change you could believe in.” I am certainly eager to see productive change which is the kind of change that we all “HOPE” for. Being a pragmatic man, I decided to appraise his progress with a simple “score card.” I will update the score card as the score changes.

Subject                       No Change                 Obama
                                      For the better          Victories
—————————————————————–
Guantanimo Bay    1                                    Obama   0
     Still there

The Economy          1                                    Obama   0
     Market is still down

Jobs                             1                                    Obama   0
     Job loss is on the increase

Taxes                           1                                    Obama   0
     Still rising

National debt           1                                    Obama   0
     Still rising

GDP                               1                                   Obama   0
     Not out-running inflation

The War                      1                                   Obama    0
     American death toll grows daily

Health Care               1                                   Obama    0
     Costs still rising

Gender prejudice   1                                   Obama    0
     Still on website - VAWA increases

Our World image    1                                   Obama    0
     Getting worse

Usurper Charges    1                                   Obama    0
     Still no Birth Certificate

Court Nomination 1                                   Obama    0
     Nominee has race and gender bias

At this point, Obama is running 0 for 12

Wash. officer’s children recant sex abuse stories
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
VANCOUVER, Wash. — Former Vancouver police officer Clyde Ray Spencer spent nearly 20 years in prison after he was convicted of sexually molesting his son and daughter. Now, the children say it never happened.
Those are the first two sentences of a very typical story about a man who was falsely accused and wrongfully imprisoned.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_wa_recanting_abuse.html

I don’t know how long this link to the rest of the story will last but the story tells of a man’s misfortune and how his children did what they could to acknowledge the wrong done to him after twenty years. It tells how happy he is to be reunited with them, as the worst part of his incarceration was separation from them.

Lovely.

Now I want the rest of the story.
Obviously there was a cooperative woman involved in this travesty. Well, what about her? Is she being charged? Was she a conspirator, or did she fight against the system to bring out the truth about her good man?
Is she paying lifetime spousal support for her abuse of him?
Is she still alive, or did those children have to wait for her to die before coming forward?
Do these children have to live with the distasteful responsibility of exposing their own mother’s crime?
What about the CPS (Child Protective Service) hit-man who made a living torturing this man’s children for over thirty days until they agreed to give false witness against their father?
What about the effects of PAS (Parental Alienation Syndrome) that his children suffered for twenty years? BTW, As a side note, some maggots call PAS insubstantial “junk science.” Ask these two thirty year old children about that.
The charges were that the abuse was repeated and extreme. Where was the judge when no evidence was offered?
Where were the lawyers? (That’s what we call a loaded question)
Now that the story has gotten to this point, where is the outrage?
I’ll bet you that there was plenty of outrage twenty years ago. Well?

This man not only needs financial security for life as the result of the abuse heaped upon him by his wife, the court, the lawyers, CPS and the Federal Government that funds all this happy horse shi*, he and his children need psychological reparations as well.

I do make some questionable assumptions in this writing and I acknowledge that. There-fore I am asking, as I did at the top of the page, for the rest of the story. Don’t give me and the public half a story. With the initial telling of the story comes the responsibility to answer any questions that arise from that story. See how it works. You start something, you take responsibility for it. This previous sentence goes for all the perpetrators in this huge fraud.

This story is one more step in the damage done to this man. My inference from the story is that the reader is supposed to feel that a wrong has been righted or that justice has finally come. No. Don’t infer that. This article is a cry out for justice for a multitude of crimes. Twenty years ago, crimes were committed, but not by the father.
Crimes were committed by CPS against children.
Crimes were committed by a mother against a father.
Crimes, or at least egregious breaches of ethics, were committed by lawyers.
Crimes were committed by a Judge against a man.
Well?
Get on with the charges, prosecution and reparations so we can get satisfactory closure.
Closure, instead of outrage.
Then, please, come back and tell the story. Millions of people need to hear it.
Come on writer. Follow up. This story cries out for a documentary. Be a real journalist.
I dare ya’.

You may think that I make this challenge with a tone of anger or arrogance,
but that is not what I feel.
What I feel is fear.
Fear, that the rest of the story is that nothing will ever be done.
Fear that the criminals will be protected.
Fear that there is no money in righteous reparation, and because of that, today’s American doesn’t care.
It seems that there is no Federal funding to do what is right. There is a huge federally funded machine in place to create crimes like this.
What we need is a program to stop them.

Now it’s time to play “Pick Your Jerky Judge.”

Now the way we play our game is simple.
First you read the article from the Associated Press that you find below. We get our news from the “AP” because our own investigative journalism has become too expensive so we out-source. You know, sorta’ like what we do with tech support, manufacturing and other stuff that we can no longer handle.

Back to our game. Now, both the accuser and the “accusee” are Judges. Only one of them can be telling the truth or maybe both aren’t. Go below, read the article and with no real knowledge of the facts, come up with your own conclusion. In my case it’s tough because I know that both parties have taken bribes from the County Supervisors. These Judges are so used to getting things done with bribes that they’ve started trying to bribe each other. OR, has the press just got it all wrong and we are being fed lies. This is normal for them, so do we believe any part of the story or not?

Either way, one of these Los Angeles County Superior Court Judges is less than “honorable.” My guess? My guess is that they’re both crooked and both are trying to lie their way out of some undisclosed “trick bag” involving a third party that is being protected. Usually in cases like this both sides tried some stunt and the whole thing back-fired. Main-stream-media will eventually give us some story. The truth? We’ll never get that, so go ahead and make up something. You know, like the guy who talks to the press does. Pick Your Jerky Judge. Your guess is as good as mine.

LA judge charged in campaign bribery case

The Associated Press
Posted: 07/09/2009 11:30:42 PM PDT

LOS ANGELES—A Los Angeles county judge has been indicted on allegations of trying to bribe his opponent to drop out of last year’s race for a judicial seat, prosecutors said Thursday.
Superior Court Judge Harvey Silberman, 52, and two political consultants are accused of offering a bribe to Deputy District Attorney Serena Murillo to back out of the municipal election, according to the indictment unsealed Wednesday. The grand jury transcript detailing the alleged scheme has not been released.
Silberman, Evelyn Jerome Alexander and Alan Randall Steinberg, were charged with solicitation of money or valuable consideration to induce a person not to become a candidate for public office, said state Attorney General’s office spokeswoman Christine Gastarac. Each face up to three years in state prison if convicted.
Alexander and Steinberg, who are partners of the public affairs firm SJA Strategies, have pleaded not guilty. Arraignment for Silberman, who’s on paid leave pending the outcome of the case, has been postponed until a judge from another county is assigned to the case, Gastarac said.
Silberman’s lawyer, Dan Nixon, said his client was also charged with solicitation to commit a crime, specifically offering accepting or joining in the offer or acceptance of a bribe. Nixon said the judge will plead not guilty.
“He maintains that he is innocent of these charges and has done nothing wrong,” Nixon said.
Steinberg’s attorney insiste his client was innocent.
“Randy’s a person of outstanding character and high morals and in this case, truth and justice will be synonymous with his complete vindication,” said attorney Steve Meister, who declined to comment on the specifics of the case.
Alexander’s attorney said he intends to raise the “credibility and reliability” of prosecution witnessess, including Murillo, when trial begins.
Silberman, a former court commissioner, was elected a judge in June 2008 by about 5 percentage points over Murillo. He oversees family law cases and presided over the highly publicized child custody battle between Charlie Sheen and Denise Richards.

Richard fine represents the hope of all Americans, that they will receive a fair deal in court. If Richard fine is not treated fairly in court, no American can expect fair treatment in court. This case is a definitive moment, a turning point in American History. March 4th 2009 may go down in history as the day rule of law in America died. Click on the imbedded link for a terrific summation of the case as it stands today.  

http://www.prweb.com/releases/Judicial_Critic_Jailed/Contempt_Of_Court/prweb2613864.htm.

We as Americans must follow Richard Fine’s leadership example and fight for our Constitutional rights “at any cost.” I consider Richard Fine to be a modern day “Founding father.” He is certainly of that caliber. Who would not be proud to serve with George Washington, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklyn or Thomas Payne? Richard Fine is fighting for America. Richard Fine is fighting for truth. Richard Fine is fighting for us all. Join him now, fore if you don’t, your turn will come and there will be no one left to fight for YOU.

How to Combat Judicial Tyranny in Los Angeles County

To kill a Vampire, you must go to the crypt during the day, open the coffin and  drive a stake through the heart of the Vampire. To know to do this, someone had to originally try it to find out if it would work. I wonder if the guy who thought of it was the one who actually had the courage and resolve to try it.

Here is the serious proposal. We have a situation here in Los Angeles County and fifty-four other California Counties where every Judge is tainted. Because they admit that they are bribed, when you face them, you must point out to them that they are incapable of giving you “honest service” and therefore you must insist on their voluntary recusal. If they fail to recuse themselves you will inform them that their ruling will be disregarded pending appeal and the Judiciary disciplinary committee will be informed of their inappropriate involvement in your case.

This is the wording as I have it. You or your lawyer may imagine that you have better wording as well you might.
I. Questions to Disqualify a Judge.
1) During the last five years have you received payments from LA County for “mega flex benefits,” professional development allowances, or contributions to a 401K or any other retirement plan?
(If the answer is yes to any part, continue with the remaining questions)
2) Have you reported such payments on your “Form 700” financial interest statements for the relevant years?
3) Do you have any contract or agreement with LA County to perform services for LA County, while you are employed by The State of California?
4) During the last year, can you tell the name of any case that you decided against LA County?
5) Can you tell me any case that you decided against LA County in the last two years? The last three years? The last four years? The last five years?
II. Statement To Disqualify That Judge.
Based upon your responses I hereby request that you recuse yourself as you have received illegal and “unconstitutional” payments from LA County as ruled in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles 167 Cal. App.4th 630 (2008) rev. denied 12/23/08 and for which you received retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution, civil liability and disciplinary action under Senate Bill SBX 2-11 enacted 2/20/09.

The illegal payments combined with the with the fact that rulings that you may make in this case may benefit LA county, violate Cannon 2 of the Judicial ethics which states that a Judge “shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the Judge’s activities.” The action are also a denial of due process as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the recently decided case of Caperton et al V. Massey Coal Co. et al, 566 U.S. – (2009) decided June 6th, 2009 and the cases cited therein.

If you do not voluntarily recuse yourself, I hereby move to disqualify you based upon your aforementioned statements, Cannon 2 of the code of Judicial ethics and the violations of due process as shown in the Massey case, pursuant to CCP code section 170.3.

*****

As this action is repeated across the State we will begin to purge the countryside of the corrupt judiciary. You probably notice that we no longer have a problem with vampires. (except of course, in Hollywood)

As the rulings of corrupt Judges are over-turned or disqualified, new uncorrupted Judges who are “pure of heart” will replace them, or we will only be able to have court when the moon is full. Millions of, for example, traffic tickets will never see court. Since the revenue that is generated by victimization of the innocent who go to court will be curtailed, the “system” will have to reinvent itself quickly. The new batch of Judges will be more carefully scrutinized.

Now, people who have family court issues will return to court to reopen their cases. In many cases this will result in disqualification of the original rulings. As family law cases are reexamined, corruption as a result of “TITLE IV-D” will disqualify child and spousal support rulings. Once again the “Silver Bullet” is fired into the werewolf. Without the judicial money grab of IV-D there will be little reason for false accusations of violence that are enjoyed by so many who exploit the illegal law of “VAWA.”

News of how to “kill the Werewolf” will spread far and wide across the land, and soon people from other states who had their original divorce case in California will return home to meet the exorcist. They will reopen their case and in many cases the ruling will be disqualified. The happy traveler will head back to the State where he makes his new home to inform the good people there that there is no longer a judgment in California so his interstate persecution must end.

This will not sit well with the disciples of Satan who will gather in covens and recite incantations to the dark side for unholy tribute. They will chant over and over Bradley, Bradley, Bradley to no avail. Another illegal piece of legislation known as “THE BRADLEY AMENDMENT” gives any court the ability to enforce rulings made in county courts in any other State, and in fact in other Countries as well.

Reexamination of “the Bradley Amendment” without the unholy stink of corruption should result in its ultimate repeal.

I am not a lawyer and of course, this is not legal advice. However, I’m sure you that you see the metaphor between the fictional monsters and the very real monster of judicial and legislative corruption. I am also sure that you see that in both cases real courage by the villagers is needed. Having the wooden spike or the silver bullet is of no use without the courage to use them. Many people have been forced to fight monsters alone and without weapons. Many of those people have found this kind of courage.

I am not a lawyer and of course, this is not legal advice, but for those who seek legal advise, remember the exorcist. See your lawyer, tell him your vision and be ready. If you see his head spin all the way around, be ready for the “pea soup.”

Hello Patriotic E-mailer, If you want to circulate something, circulate the T.E.A. Party flyer below this note. (The Flyer referred to in the original E-mail has not been included in this Blog entry) And remember, as far as “freedom isn’t free” goes, “If it isn’t free, it isn’t freedom.” The definition of Free is having no cost. What our military fights for has a great cost. What our military fights for is control. Our military fights to protect our government, from someone else taking control of our lives, from our government. It does not fight for freedom. The proof is that no American is free. Every American is controlled. This was not true in 1776, but it became true in 1913 and has been true ever since. Only when control is “by the people”, can “people” be free. Happy Independence Day Patriotic E-mailer. Our civil rights lawyer will be without his freedom for four full months on that day. He fought for “the people” but was put “under control” by tyrants. He is the only free man that I know. Look what they did to him. Look who he is. Look at who they are.