Archive for May, 2009

The 20.4 Million Dollar Question

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

We are confronted with the possibility that the feminist machine may be forced to deal with reality. As you know, feminism can not progress without government funding. Because feminism is a political agenda platform that has no real economic value, the market driven economy will never support feminism. It has no market value. Feminism can only exist with government funding.

With the economy failing on Federal, State, County and Municipal levels, governments at all these levels are being forced to face cutbacks in spending for special interest groups. Here in Los Angeles County, the county government has announced to the domestic violence industry that it may have to give them a cut of $20.4 million, that’s right million. (how the heck much are they contributing totally?)

The reaction of the Coven that received this news was that if this funding is cut, “several women’s shelters and women’s service providers would have to close.” Fortunately for men, they will not get a reduction in services since there are no services for them to reduce.

The profiteer’s dilemma is this, the Domestic Violence or “DV” industry is founded on the second biggest lie told by feminists. That lie being, that domestic violence is perpetrated by men against women 95% of the time. That statistic is basically based on the fact that calls to DV shelters (women’s shelters) are made 95% of the time by women. We now know through the research done by unbiased academic groups worldwide, that DV is initiated about equally by men and women. It also seems that when DV is spontaneous, the man typically does more harm to the woman because of his physical size advantage (this typically gets reported as DV) but that when the woman premeditates the violence, the man is at the disadvantage because women are more apt to use guns, knives and cars (this is typically not reported as DV).

Back to the dilemma. Now with the WOODS CASE beginning to be forced to be recognized by DV providers, men will have to be counted as victims when they call for services. This means that the 95% lie will begin to crumble. In addition, because their will be less services available, there will be a proportionate drop in cases reported. Ultimately the DV industry which is so good at misconstruing real facts might actually have to report that the down turn in the economy has resulted in a drop in domestic violence. This, of course, would be ridiculous, but would be substantiated by their own ridiculous statistic database.

Because of how this nonsense would not serve the DV industry, its leaders will probably just return to their original source of information. They will just construct a pack of lies and scream them from the roof tops. In fact I can hear it now “those male chauvinist pig men cut our funding.”
Now for the $20.4 million question, will we hear them tell the #1 lie? “That money wasn’t for us. It was for the children.” We’ll see!

My mother is laughing out loud.

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Last year the media spin team gave us the name “historic” to describe the installation of Unconstitutional Candidate Barack Obama into the presidency. We the people were given a silly shame of an election where, at the conclusion, some “spokes model” cried out, “the people have spoken.” All through this reality show (the ultimate reality show, i might add) my own dear mother said, whether we have this candidate for four years, eight years or he compels the people to remove him with his head on a stick, we will be stuck with his Supreme Court appointment for life.” Why on earth isn’t every presidential candidate questioned on this point? We’ve impeached presidents, recalled governors, ousted senators and congressmen, but judges? They are the sacred cows of the government. There is not even a process by which any impartial citizen committee can examine a judge, let alone remove him. There is no real full frontal assault on judicial corruption and it runs growing and unchecked throughout our country. Only the most righteous news reporters will even throw out an occasional article on this nation wide catastrophe.  Now we have a supreme court seat “up for grabs.” Now we see the action of the man that “we have elected.” Wait, that last sentence needs another grain of salt. Now we see the action of the man who was installed to shamelessly push “the agenda” forward. Regardless of how we get rid of Obama, it will probably take “the hand of God” to get rid of his Supreme Court appointee. Go ahead mom, have your laugh. You were right.

Two Issues

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

There are two issues that I want to bring up today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAXHlnhtTE4 The first issue is a reminder for the up coming FatherLESS Day rally. Please watch the you tube link and join us. The second issue is the TV commercial. We are creating a TV commercial that will be aired on the History Channel. A month ago I called out to over two hundred people by E-mail to send a photo of a father and mother with their child or children having a happy moment. I had also hoped that grand parents would be represented in these photos. As the photos were submitted, the donor would receive a legal release signed by both parents allowing us to use a photo including a child on TV. If their are any questions as to the value of this TV advertisement, please feel free to call me. Now the angry part. I asked my friends and neighbors for photos and received photos of white and asian families. Not one person from my 200 E-mails responded to this request. This E-mail list is comprised of people who we have met who said “family court is terrible, how can I help.” Well ladies and gentlemen WE NEED PHOTOS. We have white and asian families. We need black and hispanic family photos. I do not want to do this without including everybody. Surely you must know someone, somewhere in your life that has a happy family and would be happy and proud to represent, and donate a photo. WE NEED THIS TODAY. As ever, Fred Sottile

Here We Go

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Face up to Fred is an attempt to communicate with the concept of Activist TV and now with a Blog. We’ll see how it goes. As ever, Fred