FaceUpToFred

DSA lists members of the 111th session
Posted: August 15, 2010, © 2010 WorldNetDaily
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=191605
In October 2009, the Democrat Socialists of America released in its newsletter
a list of 70 members of the U.S. Congress who are members of the organization:

Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
Vice Chairs
Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
Senate Members
Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)
House Members
Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL) Could this be Guam? The Bordallos I believe are a California family. I could be wrong.
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL) Could this be the Virgin Islands? What the?
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)
The list should serve as a voting guide for the American people, at least those Americans who still believe in our Constitution.
An especially sad note for me is that 13 of the seventy are from California.
Also a point of note is that “Hon.” Is prefixed to each name. These people are anything but honorable. They take a sacred oath to uphold the Constitution when they take office and then they turn their back on that oath and proceed to move forward on their agenda of national destruction.
I point to my own oath which states “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to he REPUBLIC for which it stands.
Socialism is the down fall of any republic. America is a republic, not a democracy as so many falsely cry. Democracy can lead only to the failure of any republic. It is the agenda of the Democrat Party to cause this failure of the only nation in the world to accomplish what America and Americans have built. Who are their architects? The answer to that is the greedy and the envious. Which team are you on? Are you a builder or a destroyer? I ask you.

This entry below is so insightful that I could not change a word. Usually this blog is a commentary on “wisdom” from the street but this entry by Ray Blumhorst just says it all and says it perfectly. Thank You Ray.

http://townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2010/04/27/democrats_try_to_lock_up_their_base
Quote
“The Democrats know that 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Barack Obama in the 2008 election.”

http://townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2010/06/15/social_issues_vs_fiscal_issues/page/full
Quote
“The left is content to let this problem persist because 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Barack Obama for president.”

Sarah Palin, Michele Bachman. Ann Coulter, and Michelle Malkin are conservative women who have all been viciously attacked by the Democrat party. Phyllis Schlafly is another conservative woman who has been viciously and hatefully attacked by the lefty Dem’s for speaking her mind - significantly for her comments above.

Apparently, according to Democrat thinking, “How dare conservative women think they have the right to be anything other than quiet, subservient, mousy slaves under the feet of the Democrat party? How dare conservative women think they have minds of their own? How dare they break free of the oppression and subjugation of the Democrat party?” Apparently, according to Democrat party thinking, these upity, conservative women don’t know their place.

I guess Democrat party women must love abuse. Apparently, many have become thoroughly dependent on their abusers (the Democrat party) for economic subsistence, and apparently, the Dem’s plan to keep them that way. Any woman who criticizes, or tries to break away from the Dem’s is subject to ostracization and the most vile, verbal assaults imaginable as shown by the many vile, verbal assaults against conservative women that are abundant on left wing web sites throughout the Internet. Democrat women considering defection must surely take note and tremble in fear.

The Democrat party alleges to have many lofty goals for women, but their overall primary effect appears to be one that keeps many women barefoot, promiscuous and dependent on the nanny state. How’s that for women’s liberation?

Sincerely, Ray Blumhorst

We keep hearing them over and over:
Women and minorities get paid less than men,
The best interest of the children,
And racism, racism, rasicm.

Well, hear is another one that I remember George Carlin talking about, and as much I as appreciate everything George Carlin has done I had a particular aversion to one of his rants that was said as if true but is certainly not.

I heard it again yesterday at a “Town Hall Meeting” and though I intuitively dismissed it, I couldn’t help tossing it around in my mind.

The Lie is, America was founded on hypocrisy. The hypocrisy is that Rich White Men (Class, Race and Gender) made the rules in a self serving way.

NO! In 1776 we did not have the social fabric that we have today.
Let’s start with “Class.”
Yes, the founding fathers were educated and had means. Who else could do what they did, a bunch of ignorant starving people who could hardly feed themselves? Just to get a letter to the next town required wealth. We didn’t have the internet back them. Just communication alone was costly. And to be available to travel and be available for meetings required an ability to leave the farm in the hands of competent help.
Only independent educated people could contrive the Constitution. Look, even today people have trouble understanding the most clearly stated document imaginable. It is worded literally. It is not like the Bible or Nostradamus. It is literal and still holds up in lucidity even to this day. It really is quite flawless. Its brevity is stunning, especially by the standards of today. The Constitution is a crystal clear contract of everyman with a new nation.
Now, this nation had to have some element of cohesion. The place was crawling and I mean crawling with people of every kind, some, loyal to an enemy King. To even consider educating this mass of people from so many places was an impossible task and seems to be continually impossible today. There had to be a core group of people well enough educated and committed for the new nation to last even one year. They did it.

Next, let’s go to “Race.”
Day one of the new nation, slavery was in place all over the world and was in high gear in the new nation. Was it an important issue? Yes, of course, but was it issue #1? No. Does anybody realize that the War of 1812 was 36 years after day one of the declaration of independence? America first had to fight the revolutionary war, then the French and Indian War in the north and then the War of 1812 in the south. The founding fathers weren’t exactly sitting around whipping and impregnating their slaves for fun with a wanton disregard for human rights. They were busy working with 13 independent States trying to unify them so as to somehow create a national military despite no income taxes and very little ability to communicate at any rate of speed. Remember, any “Federal” action at that time required agreement by each and every state. As time went by, that list of States was growing. Slavery, labor issues and many other issues were on the back burner. Incredibly, even with all that, slavery was abolished by white men eighty years after “all men created equal” was written. I call that a promise kept. By the way, I came to learn today that the NAACP was started by Rich, White People.

Finally, let’s talk about “Gender.”
It’s 1776. Women at that time were homemakers and child bearers and care givers. They were the home and hearth side of the partnership between them and men. Men had the role of responsibility for physical safety of the family and financial prosperity of the family. Women were exempt from combat. Women were exempt from factory, shipyard, lumber mill, forge, Etc. They had a safe, quite and pastoral life in return for their contribution to the whole human race which was to bare and care for every human child who was ever born. The state of womanhood today and the expectations of women today is a serious step down from the exultation that women enjoyed at that time. Women were respected by all men and all law in every “western” culture merely for being this almost supernatural being who could perpetuate life. Now women have been ground down to being almost as expendable as men always have been. Soon, women will be killed in combat and die from industrial conditions and “accidents” just like men. Wouldn’t the founding fathers and their wives be shocked at the way women characterize themselves today. Where is the dignity? Until the industrial age brought enough prosperity to American homes in major cities, women largely were not involved in the military and labor aspect of creating America. It was the wealth created by men that afforded women leisure time even to address the idea of women becoming involved in politics and guess what, it was the wives of rich men and their husbands who spear headed the movement to include women in voting.

No don’t give me that Rich, White Slave-owner crap. The Constitution was a promise to the people who would embrace its tenets. Until Woodrow Wilson sold the country out, it was working perfectly. It still could if we stopped ignorant corrupt people from disregarding it and creating selfish destructive policies. They cry Rich, White, Slave-owners were hypocritical for being self serving. Then they cry for service for the Poor, Foreign, Entitlement-owner with no shame as to how “self serving” that cry is.

Gender Apartheid Online by Ruth Rosen
We will know a critical threshold has been reached when every magazine asks of every news story, “What does this mean for women and girls?”

Is this woman for real?
This is literally a demand for special treatment.

Thank you respondents. Keep writing and preaching the truth. When women do not expect and even demand chivalry at every turn, we will begin to have more equality. Right now, women are so privileged that they don’t even know the horror of what is expected of manhood. Men are there to protect them from it. This is men’s single most thankless job.
Now, equalize combat death, dismemberment and mental damage done to men and ask women, are you ready to step up? Ask women if they are ready to do the real heavy lifting that they assume is a man’s birth obligation to them. See what they say. Ask them if they are ready to die to protect the women back home and see what they say. Ask them if they are ready to die to protect the MEN back home and see what they say. Want to end the war? Simply enact an all women volunteer army. War over.

America 1776, Land of the Free, Home of the Brave
America 2010, Land of the Ignorant, Home of the Apothetic

Better stated:
America 2010 land o’ da’ ignint, Homey down wit’ whateva’

Obama Score Card – One and One Half Year Passed
I realize that Mr. Obama has only been in power for only one and a half years or about three eights of his term, but he did make very many strong statements about “change you could believe in.” I am certainly eager to see productive change which is the kind of change that we all “HOPE” for. Being a pragmatic man, I decided to appraise his progress with a simple “score card.” I will update the score card as the score changes.

Subject No Change Obama
For the better Victories
—————————————————————–
Guantanamo Bay 1 Obama 0
Still there
(now with two embarrassing terrorist disasters)
The Economy 1 Obama 0
Market is inflated with fake money
Jobs 1 Obama 0
Job loss is on the increase
Taxes 1 Obama 0
Still rising
National debt 1 Obama 0
Still rising
GDP 1 Obama 0
Not out-running inflation
The War 1 Obama 0
American death toll grows daily
(unable to handle Afghanistan)
Health Care 1 Obama 0
Costs still rising
Gender prejudice 1 Obama 0
Still on website - VAWA increases
Our World image 1 Obama 0
Getting worse
Usurper Charges 1 Obama 0
Still no Birth Certificate
S. Court Nomination 1 Obama 0
Appointee has race and gender bias
Second appointee is another joke
Believe it or not, she has no judicial experience

At this point, Obama is still running 0 for 12

A Tampa Bay area mom is furious after her daughter was hired as a nude dancer at the Emperors Gentleman’s Club in Tampa.
(Who taught her to do this? Where was her mother’s supervision?)
Her daughter is 16-years-old.
(You need to see her picture)
The mom is so angry that she filed a lawsuit against the club for violating her daughter by having her dance fully naked in front of older men, reports Tampa Bay’s

(I guess younger men would be OK)
(The Mother is really doing this because she can not come to grips with being a terrible mother and wants to cast the blame on someone, anyone else. Believe me, if she can’t victimize the strip club, she will eventually blame the daughter.)

The question still remains — how did the teen get hired in the first place?
(My guess is a poor upbringing, no father present)
Tampa attorney Joseph Bryant, who filed the suit on behalf of the teen’s mom, says the 16-year-old provided the club with a driver’s license of a 27-year-old woman.
(Probably works with the attorney who drove the father off.)

The 16 year old committed fraud upon the establishment.

If the mom wins the case against the establishment, that win will prove the case the establishment must make against the 16 year old.

The verdict against the establishment receives must then be equally applied to the 16 year old, who is the original perpetrator of the crime cascade.

Thereby the mom victimizes the 16 year old daughter.

BTW, the mom does this for money,
Just as the 16 year old did what she did, for money.
The apple in this case does not fall far from the tree.

The mother also does it for false moral judgment of her own self as a negligent parent. She, in effect makes the State and strip club responsible for the parenting that she failed to do. She is actually charging that State as a bad parent for its failure to protect her daughter.
There is severe moral failure here by the mother who interestingly enough is not charged with anything.

The other despicable creeps in the story are the lawyers, who also do what they do for money.
We live in a whore’s world.

Everyone in public office must be voted out until they come to understand that there are decent people in this world who do care enough about it to stand up and do something.
The vote is our legal demonstration. It is our duty to do this.

Happy Memorial Day.

Oh look, a study by the Harvard Brain Trust has just been released. Let’s rush it out to everybody on the Blogosphere because it supports our position.
Hogwash!
Hogwash? But Fred, this is the study we’ve been waiting for. These people are the “real” authorities and they clearly state an empirical finding that is unimpeachable because of their immense stature in the highbrow world of intellectual authority.
Fred doesn’t buy it. Why? Fred is not impressed.
How can that be?
Let me explain.
If these mental giants are truly the best and brightest, why don’t they ban together and approach the people in power and use their incredible gift of superior intellect to convince them to do the right thing?
It should be easy for these PHDs to outwit the mental midget bureaucrats and direct them towards a desire to improve what ever it is that needs improvement. Also, please note that they don’t band together. In fact, they seem to be the most isolated purveyors of activism at any level of activist pursuit. The guys that you think you need most are pretty much inaccessible. If you do manage to reach one, he is alone. He doesn’t immediately gather the rest of his ilk to spearhead action.
No. Scholars are usually ensconced in a University or Government position with a pension that is granted by some massive organization who does not want their indoctrination squad to rock the boat too hard. Scholars throughout history have been right and wrong at the same time, over and over. Think! That’s what we pay you for but don’t do anything. Just tell us what you think. You think, we act. We don’t think.
Now, the problem here is, how do you tell the real intellectual from the corrupt intellectual? A corrupt intellectual is a person who is driven by an ideology. A corrupt intellectual has a result first and then a study following to support the result. The uncorrupted intellectual is a person who has no expectation of the outcome until, through full knowledge of the subject, forms a hypothesis that is beyond reasonable argument. It is wonderful when this happens but it is also inconsequential. The intellectual does not act on the findings. He is merely the finder. If his findings are not consistent with the need of an ideology, the findings or the finder are compromised by ridicule or are ignored and the findings roll away into obscurity.
Actions speak louder than words.
Words are powerful, but only when those words reach a structure of power, either social or financial. Let’s make it clear to the intellectuals that we need them to not only make the discovery, but to then follow through and direct their incredible mental power to creating a vehicle or structure to bring their rottin’ tootin’ conclusion to someone who can use it for a better world.
In conclusion, if you are an uncorrupted intellectual and you can find other uncorrupted intellectuals, please unite and do something of substance. You should be bright enough to figure out just how to go about it. If you don’t, you may not be as bright as you think.

Once again the real story is obscured by a ridiculous diversion. There is a phenomenon that seems to occur much like any other natural phenomenon. This event of nature is as ubiquitous as the appearance of fast-food joints around the world.

What we have here is a huge story that goes unnoticed because the government owned media diverts us from it through focusing on a fabricated side conflict.

Last month in the State of Arizona, the overactive legislature used their work time to write a law exactly like a law that was already written. That was silly because the law was already in place. But that is not the issue.

Next, the government owned media howled about the injustice of the law despite the fact that the law had no element of injustice in it, thereby creating or “fabricating” a conflict.
But that is not the issue.

“Lunatic” individuals, who we have allowed to hold positions of power in our government because we are too lazy to govern ourselves, partner with the media to decry the law even though the law, though unnecessary, is completely rational.
But that is not the issue.

Next the “lunatics” decide that appropriate action is to boycott Arizona. These politicians are mayors of towns. The towns they exploit are in financial crisis. The politicians declare that they will boycott Arizona, thereby depriving Arizona of the revenue that the towns spend in Arizona. Remember, these mayors of Los Angeles and San Francisco are mayors of towns or cities or boroughs or hamlets or just pick on of the multitude of names we have for town. (Another idiotic issue)

The Los Angeles City Counsel actually takes time from the overwhelming financial crisis that is their responsibility and diverts the public from that vital issue to vote on something that is clearly a non-issue and none of their business. The reason of course is obvious, diversion.
They vote overwhelmingly to stop doing business with Arizona and state openly that this boycott of Arizona by the City of Los Angeles will cost the State of Arizona $7 Million dollars per year.
We are approaching the issue.

The City of Los Angeles provides the State of Arizona $7 Million dollars a year? Why?
Why does Los Angeles, a City, do any business with Arizona?
What possible need could the City of Los Angels have that can only be satisfied by taking $7 Million tax dollars out of the city?
Do you see the issue?

Now, what about San Francisco? How much tax money do they throw out of San Francisco and not just to Arizona but Nevada, and for that matter everywhere else?

The big story is, what is all this tax money expenditure for and why do we support outside industry when we have perfectly good resources in our own back yards?
That is the beginning of the issue.

Talk about frivolous waste. We as taxpayers don’t need to be sending delegations to other States, or even other California cities, to tip their chambermaids, busboys and porters when we have our own perfectly good illegal alien population right here to support.

The politicians opened a great big can of worms by admitting this flagrant waste of tax money and it went right over the head of everybody because everybody was diverted like mentally challenged children intrigued with the media’s shiny object. (see footnote)

We got an open confession from the politicians about this waste of tax money. We got a wide open, unsolicited confession and nobody caught it.
The question is, how much money do we waste and why?
The next question is, why don’t we understand this.

We have the confession. Right now every politician should be besieged with inquiries. They should be facing impeachment. We have the confession. Why does it mean nothing to us?
Now that is the issue.

Footnote: Racism, the Shiny Object. Carl Marx instructed subversives to divide the population on race, class and gender. It has always been obvious to me that Obama was hired to do this. His galloping return of racism to the American focus has been a job well done. Racism, a non-issue during the Bush Presidency, is subverting and distracting sleepy citizens from the real issue, which is government/banks usurpation of power. “Mrs. VAWA” Joe Biden, is certainly the superstar in gender division. And, as far as class is concerned, the economic meltdown is entirely a product of government intrusion into a matter which is “out of bounds” for government, and that of course, is business.

(Editorial comment) Right now every taxpayer is paying child and spousal support whether they know it or not. Most do not know. Because it is taken from them as part of their tax payment, they seem to not care. Apparently, those people will allow their taxes to be increased, and rightly so, until they do care. Politicians know that those people’s complacency limit has not yet been found. Apparently, only crippling taxes will take their eyes off the “shiny objects” and onto their own real life. They are that stupid.

While we’re here, let’s give a “shout out” to Eric Holder and his abdication from responsibility and his groveling “lackeyism,” America’s top attorney, the poster-boy for
Throw The Bums Out.

Greetings Mr. Green, in regard to your closing comments in the article below, apparently Mr. Turner had feelings too. In fact I would guess that his feelings were hurt badly, very badly. I would guess that he was brought to a point where his desperation was so great that doing what he did actually made sense to him. Who do you suppose did that and why?
Dear Josh, I’m afraid you missed the big story here. I hope that you don’t ever find yourself to be the victim of the bigotry that is “family” court. If you do, you will learn the “bigger” story.
Respectfully, Fred Sottile

SUWANEE — Suwanee police say the gunman in a rampage that left himself and two Gwinnett mothers dead this week could have been upset about paying child support.
An investigation is in preliminary stages, but evidence suggests that Kenneth Michael Turner may have spouted threats to co-workers at Wal-Mart in Suwanee hours before the killings, said Suwanee police spokesman Capt. Clyde Byers.
Byers said Turner worked part-time, possibly in a janitorial-type capacity. A Wal-Mart representative said Thursday that company policy prohibited her from verifying employment over the phone.
“I understood he was disgruntled about child support payments (but) it sounds like it may have been multiple things,” Byers said. “My guys are trying to look into those things.”
Investigators believe Turner fatally shot his estranged girlfriend and mother of their 8-month-old child, Tiffany Hulsey, 24, after kicking in the door of her AMLI at McGinnis Ferry apartment Tuesday night.
Turner also killed a Dacula woman police believe was staying at the apartment, Deanna Griffin, 36, before turning the gun on himself, police said.
Hulsey’s 5-year-old daughter and Griffin’s 7-year-old daughter witnessed the slayings, police said. All three children are in the custody of relatives.
Ashley Lyon, Hulsey’s longtime friend, said Hulsey’s children meant the world to the 2004 Collins Hill High School graduate.
Hulsey’s Facebook postings invariably involved her two girls, Lyon said.
“She was totally dedicated to her girls,” Lyon said. “She was an amazing mother and individual.”
Save a fatal stabbing in February, the last known murder within Suwanee city limits happened in 1965.